Select Page

Lidl v Tesco – An Unexpected Outcome

Last updated Feb 15 2024 | Business Law

by Leonardo Bosco

by Leonardo Bosco

Trainee Solicitor

In this article

1. No sufficient difference.

Lidl argued that their mark carried a reputation and the Tesco Clubcard mark was sufficiently similar to the Lidl mark.

Tesco did not contest the substantial reputation of Lidl’s mark, and emphasised the difference between the two marks. This consisted mainly of the text “Lidl” and the red circle.

Despite this, the judge deemed the logos similar enough to merit further investigation.

Looking to book a consultation?

Other related articles.

Be the first to hear the latest from us.

All our latest updates direct from us, written by us. No spam, no passing your details on, just pure, unadulterated news.

And if you’ve heard enough from us, you can unsubscribe at any time.

Like it, share it.

If you found the contents of this blog useful, please feel free to share it on social media. Sharing our article helps others in need find the same information.

Be the first to hear the latest from us.

All our latest updates direct from us, written by us. No spam, no passing your details on, just pure, unadulterated news.

And if you’ve heard enough from us, you can unsubscribe at any time.

Like it, share it.

If you found the contents of this blog useful, please feel free to share it on social media. Sharing our article helps others in need find the same information.